Retirement at 65 or 67 – baby boomers need to think about who pays
It’s early days for media coverage on this I know, but I haven’t seen or read anything on how the people who are going to have to pay the baby boomer retirement bill feel about raising the age of retirement to 67 – that is anyone whose hair hasn’t turned grey or started to disappear or has a face full of wrinkles.
The young people of NZ are, at the moment, invisible in this issue.
This isn’t surprising. We baby boomers have a habit of getting what we want. This won’t change as more and more of us retire, reversing the flow of our cash into the government’s coffers.
The reality is that the sheer weight of numbers at the ballot box means we’ll continue to get our way for a while yet.
And unless we have a change of heart, the losers will be our children.
For sure it’s not our fault that we are so numerous. Blame our parents.
And yeah, we paid our taxes (but not for our Super).
And we deserve dignity in our old age.
But if we put ourselves in the shoes of our children, these arguments can look like financial tyranny.
They’ll be the ones who’ll increasingly be paying for our ever more costly Super, medical treatment and hospital care.
The financial crisis, and the financial system that spawned it, have boomer mitts all over them and our children are already paying for that on the unemployment line.
As mentioned in my last post, 2010 kicked off a significant shift in who pays for what. The oldest of the boomers (born 1946) are leaving the work force so from a national budget point of view boomers have begun the move from being contributors to costs.
So we boomers need to think carefully about things like the retirement age.
We’re not the ones who are going to be paying.
Sad but true. Just think also the burden is going to get worse with every generation unless we do something crazy like 1 child per family policy.
Stewart Farr, October 31, 2011 at 12:57 pm
Ha, or the dreaded ‘e’ word, rhymes with Oceania.
admin, October 31, 2011 at 9:59 pm